Committee on Public Undertakings seeks details
of DIAL-AAI contract
New Delhi, Oct. 16:
Fresh trouble is brewing for Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL).
Yet another Parliament panel, the Committee on Public Undertakings
(CoPU), has decided to consider the Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG)
report on implementation of public-private partnership project by Airports
Authority of India (AAI) at Indira Gandhi International Airport, Delhi.
While the Public Accounts Committee has already started deliberations on
the report, the committee on subordinate legislation of the Rajya Sabha is
verifying the AAI (Major Airports) Development Fees Rules, 2011, which empowered
DIAL to levy fee from passengers.
The CoPU, headed by senior Congress MP Jagadambika Pal, will be looking
at the implementation of operation, management and development agreement (OMDA)
signed by the AAI and DIAL. It will particularly look into paragraph 2.3 of the
CAG report, which discussed the concession period provided to the developer,
allegedly violating a Cabinet note in 2003. Sources in the panel said the CAG
will make a presentation on the report at its meeting here on Thursday.
CoPU is likely to call key officials of Civil Aviation Ministry, AAI and
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority on the issue for the details of the
contract between DIAL and AAI.
“This is a serious report. All CAG reports that comment on public sector
undertakings will be reviewed,” a panel member said.
The CAG report, tabled in Parliament during the winter session, had said
that a Cabinet note in 2003 said the existing 30 years’ concession to the
developer on traffic volumes, tariffs, concession period and capital costs
could be extended by another 30 years only after a mutual agreement and
negotiation of terms by the developer and AAI.
“However, as per the final bid documents, the ‘subject to mutual
agreement and negotiation of terms’ was left out,” the report had said, adding
that the OMDA, signed in April 2006, did not contain any provision of mutual
agreement and fresh negotiations before extension of the concession period.
The report had pointed out that DIAL got the right to extend the term
for another 30 years because of this lapse.
“This is not only a violation of the commitment in the initial Cabinet
Note but also unilateral and unfair advantage given to DIAL which is
detrimental to Government interest, as it does not provide the Government any
scope for review of any of the conditions in OMDA and SSA,” the CAG had added.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-economy/another-house-panel-to-look-into-cag-report-on-dial/article4003465.ece