Sunday, 10 June 2012

Air India stir: A case of sibling rivalry?


New Delhi, June 9:  
“Should one partner get all the benefits in a merger?” is the question that the Indian Commercial Pilots Association (ICPA), the outfit of the erstwhile Indian is asking about the reasons behind a section of their Air India counterparts being on agitation for over a month now.
These pilots have been on agitation protesting various management decisions, including offering training on the Boeing 787 to pilots from the erstwhile Indian.
Declining to go on record as they would not like to comment on ‘fellow travellers', senior ICPA executives told Business Linethat the Boeing 787 was an ideal replacement for the A-330 aircraft and pilots from the erstwhile Indian should also be given a fair chance to operate it.
AI-Indian merger
Erstwhile, Air India and Indian were merged in April 2007 into the new entity called Air India. Before that happened, Air India had a different set of pilots who were mostly flying wide-body aircraft such as the Boeing 777 and Boeing 747 on long-haul routes to the US, Canada, Europe, Far-East and the Gulf.
Indian had its own set of pilots who largely operated the smaller Airbus A-320 or the Boeing 737 family of aircraft that were deployed in India and to neighbouring countries in South Asia, the Gulf and South-East Asia. Further, erstwhile Air India had ordered 27 Boeing 787 aircraft, the delivery of which is to start sometime this month.
And herein lies the bone of contention. While conceding that across the industry, pilots who fly wide-body aircraft get paid more than those who fly narrow-body aircraft, ICPA sources claimed that in other airlines the pay disparity is not as much as it is in Air India.
“In foreign airlines this disparity is about Rs 30,000 to Rs 40,000 net per month but in Air India it is twice as much,” a senior ICPA official said.
ICPA officials also maintain that flying the Boeing 787 which will be operational on domestic routes as well will give them a chance to improve their flying hours. And though they do not spell it out in so many words this will also add to what they earn every month.
In May last year, ICPA had gone on strike demanding more flying hours so that they could come closer to the hours that Air India pilots fly.
And now it is the turn of pilots owing allegiance to erstwhile Air India going on agitation.
“It is exactly like two kids fighting and saying, you have given to one and not the other… so one says fine I will go stand in a corner. Look beyond that. You cannot lay claim to one aircraft and say this is mine,” ICPA officials say.
Pooh-poohing claims that pilots of Indian had got a salary hike, ICPA sources said that this was an “oversimplification” of facts. “We have improved our salary structure by ensuring that we get 72 hours of flying a month instead of 45 hours but we are still not at 80 hours (that AI gets) and our hourly rate still remains what it was in 2007,” they said.
Salary structure
ICPA officials also pointed out that when pilots start out in Indian and AI, the salary structure is similar – about Rs 4,500 gross for an hour. But after 7th or 8th year an Air India pilot gets almost twice as much as a pilot from the erstwhile Indian.
“This is because their jump per month of service is exponential while pilots from Indian get Rs 175 per hour for every additional year of service. So at the end of seven years we get less than Rs 1,000 while an AI pilot gets Rs 7,000-8,000,” they add.
What is also irking ICPA members is the fact that 90 per cent of the airline's losses are from wide-body aircraft, flown by Air India pilots, and they are being made to pay for this.
Further, ICPA members also question the logic behind getting foreign pilots for the wide-body aircraft. “AI will need foreigners to fly the 787. Why do they prefer a foreigner to us?” they ask.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-economy/article3511681.ece

No comments:

Post a Comment