The court was hearing a petition
filed by Capt. Sumeer Saini and his fellow pilots seeking payment of their back
wages and other perquisites due to them
New Delhi: The Delhi high court
on Wednesday asked the Centre and the Air India management to respond to a plea
of striking pilots that their salaries and other pecuniary benefits have not
been paid.
“Issue notice to the respondents
(the Centre and the Air India). A reply be filed within a week,” Justice S. P.
Garg said.
The court was hearing a petition
filed by Capt. Sumeer Saini and his fellow pilots seeking payment of their back
wages and other perquisites due to them.
Senior advocate Pinki Anand,
appearing for the pilots, said, “Salaries of nearly 450 pilots are due. This
petition has got nothing to do with the ongoing agitation. The EMIs (to be paid
by pilots) and other things are getting delayed.”
The lawyer was responding to the
remarks of Justice Garg that “how can their plea be entertained when they are
on strike”.
Anand said that the pilots, who
went on a strike from 7 May, have not been paid their dues for the period prior
to their strike. The court has now posted the matter for further hearing on 10
July.
Lalit Bhasin, counsel for the AI
management, opposed the plea of the pilots, saying “their plea cannot be
entertained till they end their strike”.
Earlier, Justice Reva Khetrapal
had issued contempt notices to 67 striking Air India pilots and their
representative body, Indian Pilots Guild (IPG), for disobeying its earlier
order by which their stir was termed as illegal.
The high court had on 9 May
restrained over 200 agitating pilots from continuing their “illegal strike”,
reporting sick and staging demonstrations, a day after the airline management
sacked 10 pilots and derecognised their union.
The court had also said allowing
such a strike to continue would cause irreparable loss to the company as well
as huge inconvenience to the passengers travelling by the national carrier.
The IPG had challenged the May 9
ex-parte order of the single judge holding the strike as illegal. A division
bench of the court had, subsequently, dismissed their plea, saying the pilots
could not “wilfully and flagrantly” disobeying court orders to end their
“illegal” strike and could face contempt action.
The pilots, under the IPG banner,
are agitating over the rescheduling of Boeing 787 Dreamliner training and
matters relating to their career progression.
The IPG is protesting AI’s
decision to train pilots of Indian Commercial Pilots Association (ICPA), a
union of pilots of erstwhile domestic carrier Indian Airlines, for Dreamliner
Boeing aircraft.
Earlier, the AI management had
filed an injunction suit terming the strike as illegal and had said due to the
pilots’ stir, the company was compelled to cancel some of its international
flights which had resulted in extreme hardship and also inconvenience to the
passengers.
As a result of the cancellation
of flights, Air India was facing financial loss of over Rs10 crore per day, it
had said.
No comments:
Post a Comment