In
a setback to Kingfisher Airlines, the Karnataka High Court, on Wednesday,
directed the company to deposit 50 per cent of the total amount of Rs.371 crore
that the company is required to remit to the Income Tax Department as tax
deducted at source (TDS) from its employees and payments made towards company
expenses.
The
High Court has also asked the company to furnish bank guarantee for the
remaining amount
Though
the Department claims that the total amount due is Rs.371 crore, the company
has disputed this and has claimed that the amount payable is much less.
However,
the Court has said that TDS already remitted by the company would be adjustable
in computing the amount to be deposited.
A
Division Bench, comprising Justice D. V. Shylendra Kumar and Justice B.
Manohar, passed the interim order on the separate appeals filed by the
Department and the company, challenging the May 25 order of the Tribunal.
The
Tribunal, while allowing an appeal by the company against the demand to pay TDS
amount, had said that the Department had issued notices without providing the
company a reasonable and sufficient opportunity of being heard. The Tribunal had
remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
The
Tribunal also had said that it was not clear whether TDS was only in connection
with the salary or also about other payments of expenses.
On
appeals filed by the Department, a Division Bench of the High Court in June had
passed the interim order, staying the operation of the Tribunal’s order.
Subsequently, the company too filed appeals against the Tribunal order and
another Division Bench granted stay in favour of the company.
The
contentious issue dates back to December last, when the Department demanded
payment of Rs.371 crore as TDS from the company for assessment years 2010-11,
2011-12, and 2012-13, following analysis of records during search conducted in
the company’s premises in Bangalore and other places. Later, the Department had
attached the bank accounts of the company for some period during February,
2012, and had recovered some part of the amount, and subsequently the company
itself had made some payments.
The
Department’s claim has been that the company had illegally withheld the revenue
payable to the government even after deducting the said amount from various
sources, including by way of TDS.
The
Court has adjourned further hearing on the appeals.
No comments:
Post a Comment