President Barack Obama signed
a law Tuesday that shields U.S. airlines from having to comply with a
greenhouse-gas standard adopted by the European Union, ratcheting up a conflict
that reflects U.S. concerns about European environmental measures.
The bill recently passed both the House
and the Senate, with both Republican and Democratic lawmakers saying the EU
lacked the power to create standards for U.S. operators.
The EU’s program requires airlines using
European airports to obtain allowances for carbon dioxide emitted during the
full length of their flights. Airlines that exceed designated limits will be
allowed to buy additional allowances on the open market.
Earlier this month, the EU said it would
postpone the greenhouse-gas program for a year. The EU said it was encouraged by
progress being made in a United Nations agency that develops global aviation
policy and is working on similar standards for use around the world.
Despite the EU delay, U.S. lawmakers said
the law signed by Mr. Obama was needed in case the U.N. effort stalled and the
EU went ahead with enforcing its program in 2013.
“American sovereignty will no longer be
threatened by the EU’s illegitimate and disingenuous ‘environmental’ tax on our
country,” said Sen. John Thune (R., S.D.), the primary author of the bill, on
Tuesday.
U.S. airlines said the greenhouse-gas
requirement would have cost them $3 billion between now and 2020. Some airlines
already started to charge fees on trans-Atlantic flights to cover future costs.
The law doesn’t immediately forbid U.S. airlines from taking part in the EU
program but empowers the administration to exempt U.S. airlines at a future
date.
“We regret the...decision to adopt the
so-called Thune bill,” a spokeswoman for the EU said. “We encourage all
countries, including the U.S., to focus their efforts on injecting positive
ideas and forward-looking solutions into that UN-led process.”
“The Obama administration is firmly
committed to reducing harmful carbon pollution from civil aviation,” a White
House spokesman said. “But, as we have said on many occasions, the application
of the EU [standard] to non-EU air carriers is the wrong way to achieve that
objective.”
Environmental groups said Mr. Obama’s
handling of the EU airline bill marked his first test on climate change
following re-election. In previous weeks, environmental groups criticized the
president for failing to talk about climate change during campaign debates.
World Wildlife Fund, one of the
environmental groups supporting the EU, said Tuesday it was “disappointed” the
measure was signed into law. The group said it was pleased, however, that the
U.S. was willing to adopt a global standard under the umbrella of the U.N.’s
International Civil Aviation Organization.
Depending on what the EU decides to do a
year from now, the new U.S. law could escalate tensions over the greenhouse-gas
standard. China, Russia and other nations have said they also oppose the EU’s
program.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324784404578145602934327318.html
No comments:
Post a Comment